Mr. Wetzel is recommended for Copyright by The Legal 500 US and recognized for his “very high knowledge level and expertise in music and copyright.”The Legal 500 US 2021

Joe Wetzel

San Francisco
  • 505 Montgomery Street
  • Suite 2000
  • San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
  • USA
 
 

Joe Wetzel is a first-chair trial lawyer who focuses on cutting-edge music and software copyright issues, representing clients from emerging companies to the biggest household names.

For almost two decades, Mr. Wetzel has represented clients at the trial and appellate levels in a variety of complex litigation matters. He regularly counsels large and small clients on various copyright and licensing issues faced by traditional and new media platforms.

Mr. Wetzel is often recognized for his work in copyright law. He was recommended in Copyright by The Legal 500 US in 2018-2021 and named a Top Music Lawyer by Billboard magazine in 2020-2022; named a Rising Star by Law360 in 2014, 2015, and 2017; and named a Future Star by Benchmark Litigation 2017-2021. He appeared in the 2016 Benchmark Litigation Under 40 Hot List and was selected for The Daily Journal Top 40 Under 40 for his work in intellectual property and media and entertainment litigation issues. Mr. Wetzel serves on the Board of Directors of Chapter 510 & the Dept. of Make Believe, a youth writing and publishing center serving students in Oakland.

Mr. Wetzel’s recent experience includes representing:

  • A leading medical device company in a software copyright infringement action
  • A social media platform against copyright infringement claims brought by a music rights administrator
  • A leading e-commerce platform against copyright infringement claims brought by academic publishers
  • The respondent as trial counsel in complete defense of arbitrated claims seeking over US$100 million in additional music license fees
  • A leading streaming service in concurrent, industrywide Copyright Royalty Board proceedings against music publishers to set statutory license terms for interactive streaming services from 2018-2027
  • A trade organization as lead trial counsel and appellate counsel in industrywide proceeding before the Copyright Royalty Board to set rates for use of sound recordings by noninteractive streaming services
  • Two leading streaming services in a series of putative class actions and appeals over the use of old sound recordings
  • A leading events promoter and a music licensing committee in rate-setting litigations against BMI
  • More than 7,000 commercial radio stations in rate-setting arbitration against SESAC under a Radio Music License Committee antitrust settlement*
  • A multinational technology company in a landmark multi-billion dollar copyright infringement lawsuit regarding the copyrightability and fair use of APIs*
  • A private standards development organization in copyright infringement claims associated with unauthorized reproduction, display, and distribution of copyrighted standards*
  • US digital download stores and a sound recording aggregator in a putative class action alleging more than a billion dollars in damages for infringement of composers’ and publishers’ copyrights*
  • Audio and audiovisual licensees as trial counsel in three ASCAP/BMI rate court trials*
  • Audio and audiovisual licensees as appellate counsel in four Second Circuit appeals of ASCAP/BMI rate court decisions*

*Matter handled prior to joining Latham

Thought Leadership

Mr. Wetzel frequently speaks on copyright and licensing issues faced by media companies in the performance or distribution of content on a range of traditional and new media platforms.

He has taught Music Law at the UC Berkeley School of Law and has guest lectured in a range of internet and copyright law classes at the Bay Area’s top law schools.

 
 
 
Notice: We appreciate your interest in Latham & Watkins. If your inquiry relates to a legal matter and you are not already a current client of the firm, please do not transmit any confidential information to us. Before taking on a representation, we must determine whether we are in a position to assist you and agree on the terms and conditions of engagement with you. Until we have completed such steps, we will not be deemed to have a lawyer-client relationship with you, and will have no duty to keep confidential the information we receive from you. Thank you for your understanding.